Catching up - it's coming...
Tomorrow I cam giving a presentation on World AIDS Day for a friends company staff. I posted a couple weeks ago the first of the three intro/history blogs i wrote regardingthe issue. I am posting the second two now.
In the next few days I will post the presentation slides and information.
Dec 1 is around the corner. what are you doing?
In the next few days I will post the presentation slides and information.
Dec 1 is around the corner. what are you doing?
Funerals, New Realities, and a few Cocktails.
If the 1980s contributed largely to the evolution of society in
the United States, then the 1990s saw the affects of such radical changes and
created action around them.
While The 1980s had their share of deaths from HIV/AIDS a majority
of the public had not seen the relatable faces of HIV/AIDS yet. The 1990s would change that. Ryan White died in 1991 (incidentally the
year of the first ever World AIDS Day. Ryan
was well known for being the poster-child for the movement to stop
discrimination against people living with AIDS.
Ryan, a hemophiliac, was infected with HIV from a blood-transfusion and
diagnosed in 1984. After being diagnosed
and given only 6 months to live, Ryan attempted to return to school- to outrage
from parents and teachers which blew up into a national story about HIV/AIDS.
Ryan, though only in middle school, took this in stride and began speaking
about HIV/AIDS education and issues, teaching an entire public about the actual
risks of transmitting a virus that until then was barely understood by
Americans.
Ryan White’s death (which came only one month before his High
School Graduation, 5 years after Doctors had predicted) was one of many
high-Profile deaths that began the 1990s, a stark reality to the rest of the
public that HIV/AIDS was more than a distant threat to “Junkies and Gays.” The 1990s saw the Death of Rock Hudson, actor
and icon of masculinity; Freddie Mercury, and Arthur Ashe added to the publicity
factor, in addition to many virtually unknown people who went public with the
message that this virus wasn’t just attacking a gay population.
With the publicity of Magic Johnson’s diagnosis, and dozens of
others; came louder cries for action in the area of education and testing. Newborn babies were being infected at birth,
young children and elderly were being infected by blood transfusions, and a
decades long struggle with addiction to IV drug use nation-wide was showing its
ugly side-effects. If it was morning in
America in the 1980s then it was surely midday in the 1990s and America was
being seen under the bright light of the midday sun.
Action was the word of the day throughout the mid and late
1990s. With the CDC reports showing that
hundreds of Americans were infecting each other by sharing used needles, the
federal government refused to allow money to be spent on providing clean
needles, or teaching addicts how to clean their needles. Hundreds of activists in California, New York
and many other metropolitan areas throughout the country began collecting their
own funds to buy bleach or clean syringes to exchange them on the streets. The beginning of what would be the largest
effort of privately-funded charitable healthcare efforts in history. Communities organized around each other to
pay medical expenses, opened AIDS hospice centers in larger cities like
Chicago, New York City, San Francisco and Los Angeles.
While the Ryan White Act budgeted federal dollars for some
assistance to HIV/AIDS treatment, daily living expenses were the burden for
most patients who were too ill or emotionally unstable to work.
While GLBT communities mostly were coming together nationwide to
raise money and take turns caring for their HIV/AIDS suffering friends
scientists and doctors were working hard to find better treatment than the
barely working AZT that was the status quo currently.
In
1995 one of 3 new HIV medications, antiretroviral drugs and protease
inhibitors, was introduced to the market, followed by two more in the coming
two years. These drugs, mixed with each
other in various combinations, helped to block the symptoms and then eventually
with minor changes, the actual ability of the virus to continuously reproduce
within the human body, lengthening life for HIV patients by years.
The
cocktail era ushered in new hope for people living with HIV, the formation of
ACTUP in the late 1980s led to activism and pressure on governments to help,
and in the1990s PLWA Foundation and Gay Mens Health Crisis of NY and many other
organizations were able to look to a new mission. While they were still advocating for
research, better treatments, and more money they were now looking at a new
series of issues. People living with HIV
no longer had 6-12 months to live, they might live for a few years, or longer,
in fact no one knew how successful these drugs would be, but what would we do
about such a large population living a suddenly inexplicable life span. How would we pay for their cost of living?
What kind of medical treatment goes along with long-term cocktail therapy? What other unknowns are out there?
The
end of the 1990s ushered in another high profile debate in America. How best to
prevent new transmissions of the virus.
Knowing that sharing needles, sexual encounters and traditional birthing
methods and blood transfusions were all easy ways to spread the virus to new
people. The question became how best to avoid these new transmission? Do we
teach safer Sexual practices? Do we mandate treatment with cocktails and
require c-sections of HIV positive pregnant women? Do we provide cleaner
needles for drug addicts or simply tell them to stop using? These debates would
carry us into the new century, with a virus that was finally appearing to come
under control, but a long way from ending an epidemic.
If the 1980s changed America's social dynamics and way of
thinking, then the 1990s forced conversations about the difficult issues after
the sexual revolution and in a new post-HIV onset world. The new millennium
would usher in a new wave of scientific discoveries, better treatments, new
prevention methods and the beginning of a global fight against AIDS, but with
these discoveries we would also see the greatest responsibilities yet.
These responsibilities include those of the government,
individuals and advocates. Governments are faced with moral dilemmas of
balancing budgetary costs against providing humane care for people living with
HIV/AIDS for decades. The struggle for how to approach a Sub-Saharan African
population that has more HIV+ people than Negative; and how individuals deal
with the stigma of HIV/AIDS. Individuals must be educated on prevention
methods, how the virus is truly transmitted to individuals and how to protect
ones self. Powerful new tools against the virus bring with them heavy
responsibilities for a new world in a new millennium.
Blog 3
A new millennium and a new beginning
The 2000 started with a sigh of relief for most of the developed world;
computers and technology had not in fact begun the end of civilization. Most people maintained power, no one stormed
grocery stores or was forced into their basement bunker for weeks on end. But the new joy of surviving the change over
computer calendars and eras in World History would soon be forgotten with
Terrorist Attacks, Highly contested Presidential elections and a new worldviews
of security and safety.
Among all these changes the issue of HIV/AIDS became a less talked
about, less “sexy” issue, though it was still ravaging communities
worldwide. By the year 2000-448,060
Americans had died of HIV/AIDS—more than double the number of Americans who
were injured, went missing or died in relation to the Vietnam conflict. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
reported that by the year 2000 774, 467 Americans had been infected with AIDS. The only decline in new infections that had
occurred since the beginning of the epidemic had been in the mid 90s and it was
a small drop in new infections. The US
was facing multiple crises with regard to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. A new CDC and Institute of Medicine report
said the US was “failing miserably in its attempts to prevent new infections;”
and called the US out for ignoring the most effective and cost effective
prevention methods. In 2001 the CDC set
a goal to cut in half the number of newly infected people each year, to 20,000
by 2005. By 2003 it was more than clear
that goal would not be reached, and American HIV Activists started calling for
better leadership and a less puritanical attitude toward prevention. By 2006 the CDC was finally publishing health
guidelines that suggested HIV testing happen regularly for all Adolescents and
Adults who are seeking healthcare. More
than 25% of Americans who were living with HIV/AIDS in the mid 2000s still were
not aware of their infection, and the labeling of the disease as a “Gay
disease” for so long was biting the public back hard, specifically
African-Americans. Black Americans were
nearly 51% of new infections but the middle of this decade, but still only
represented 13% of the American population.
Outcry from the Black Population forced the CDC to change its
prevention guidelines to aim their efforts at communities that were suffering
higher rates of infection, but with models that only suggest abstinence, very
little progress was being made.
Meanwhile another crisis was being publicized; the virus had spread
back to, or originated in Africa, mostly Sub-Saharan Africa. And with a lack of resources to first-world
healthcare, ravaging the population. By
2004 it was estimated that up to 1 in 4 African children would be born HIV+ by
the end of the decade, most of those would lose their parents and become
orphans by the age of 5.
In 2004 George W Bush created PEPFAR (President’s Emergency Plan for
AIDS Relief) was launched, the first ever “cohesive” plan to attack the AIDS
Epidemic worldwide, though there would still be no cohesive plan for the US
until 2010.
2006, though debates were still flaring up nationally and in many
localities nationwide about abstinence only education and needle exchange as
methods of prevention, the next new development inHIV medications would
surface, the first ever one-a-day pill with combination therapy. It included a new component that stopped the
virus from entering healthy cells in the human body (a first, and major
breakthrough in an era when the virus was becoming drug-resistant) **I want to note here the science of HIV and
its treatment is incredibly interesting, but could take hundreds of pages to
explain, and is best left for those who are highly interested.**
The newest wave of medications, which would set off an explosion of
Anti-Retroviral Therapies that help alleviate the problem of drug-resistant
virus strains, and extend life to an unknown-expected span.
Today the world of HIV/AIDS is facing completely different problems
than every before. People living with HIV are living into their golden years
and beyond, some for over 15 years of being positive. HV Doctors are now facing other issues with
their patients, things they never expected to see with HIV+ patients like heart
disease, dementia and Alzheimer’s, terminal cancers rather than dying of HIV,
their patients are dying of completely unrelated aging problems. But, how do we care for such a large
population for such a long time?
In the year 2012 we have amazing new tools to fight HIV, including pre-exposure
medications(not a vaccine) and post-exposure medications(think Morning after
pill for HIV), we have new understandings of the actual risk of HIV+ people in
treatment and their transmission possibilities.
WE have a clear knowledge that we can prevent babies born with HIV by
changing methods of delivering them, medicating mothers and not breast
feeding. We know that syringes are an
absolute way to transmit the virus, and that providing clean needles to
drug-addicts is a great way to make sure we cut he new transmissions down
significantly. WE have a national plan
to fight HIV within our borders, and we have reached the understanding that
banning travelers from out of the country who are living with HIV, is not the
way to fight the disease. In 2010 President
Obama lifted the travel ban; the World AIDS Conference happened in the United
States for the first time in 15 years, in 2012 because of this change in
policy.
American Pressure on Pharmaceutical companies, though some would argue
not enough, has forced them to provide medications to developing nations at
discounted rates, that allow their citizens to access treatments they would
otherwise never have been able to seek.
We also have seen the effect fo educating that public, in culturally
appropriate ways, about their methods of prevention and transmission, and are
finally seeing a slow-down in the rate of increase of new infections in
Sub-Saharan Africa, India and the Southeast Asia.
In 2012 we have seen HIV transform our Nation and our World. We have
seen it alter consciousness about specific populations and behaviors, we’ve
seen it attack and pressure a healthcare system already on the edge of
breaking. We’ve seen HIV go from a death sentence that turned its victims into
demented monsters on television; to normal otherwise healthy individuals who
simply take an extra pill or two a day to keep it under control. We’ve seen the Ryan White Care Act be
re-authorized, along with ADAP(AIDS Drug Assistance Program) to provide access
to populations below the poverty line, to increase their abilities to stay
alive. Movies like “And the Band Played
On” and The Broadway Play “The Normal Heart” have painted a picture of the
issues the GLBT community faced while movies like “Philadelphia”-with the help
of Tom Hanks and Denzel Washington brought the idea of HIV discrimination to a
new world of Americans.
In 2012 the World AIDS Conference coming to America began a new era,
once again, in HIV and the way we approach it.
With all the technology, the understanding, the treatment, the near
cures(to be discussed in the event at Fidelity in two weeks) and the new
outlook, why are we still seeing an increase in new diagnoses? Why haven’t we
controlled the spread of the most dangerous virus or illness really since the
The Plague, and one that is almost entirely preventable? When will we learn
what we have to do, and how to de implement the new information we have? How do we approach a new generation of young
sexually active people who are suffering “AIDS fatigue,” with a prevention
message that works? And what do we do with new information about the rate of
transmission between an HIV- person and their HIV+ partner, who is on
treatment?
Next week we will discuss the political movement to END AIDS in this
decade, and prepare for a conversation on Nov 29 about what we as individuals
can do to participate in a historic decade of movement on arguably the greatest
health-crisis in American history.